fbpx
Saturday, March 1, 2025
HomeUncategorizedForest Service Staff Told It’s Unnecessary to Respond to Musk’s Demand to...

Forest Service Staff Told It’s Unnecessary to Respond to Musk’s Demand to Justify Work

SUPERIOR NATIONAL FOREST – Employees of the U.S. Forest Service and other staff employed by the Department of Agriculture were told Monday that any response to the highly pub­licized email from the fed­eral government demand­ing they explain what they accomplished last week at work “is voluntary and not required.”

The email, sent over the weekend from the Office of Personnel Management and shared with Paddle and Portage, asked employees to send approximately five bullet points listing what they accomplished last week. The email requested that employees not send any classified information, links or attachments and said em­ployees must respond by a deadline of Monday (Feb. 24) at 10:59 p.m. Central Time.

Some employees who work for the Forest Ser­vice on Superior National Forest, which includes the entire Boundary Waters Ca­noe Area Wilderness, did respond to the email, ac­cording to sources Paddle and Portage spoke with Feb. 24. There was speculation, primarily driven by Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), that not respond­ing to the email and listing the five bullet points could result in a federal employee losing their job.

However, the Department of Agriculture, which over­sees the Forest Service, sent out an unsigned email to employees Monday after­noon informing them that “there is no penalty for not responding to the request.” The letter from USDA was shared Monday evening in its entirety with Paddle and Portage.

Musk, meanwhile, dou­bled down late Monday on the missive from the Of­fice of Personnel Manage­ment (OPM) demanding that federal employees list five accomplishments from the past week that they per­formed while working.

“The email request was ut­terly trivial, as the standard for passing the test was to type some words and press send! Yet so many failed even that inane test, urged on in some cases by their managers. Have you ever witnessed such INCOMPE­TENCE and CONTEMPT for how YOUR TAXES are being spent?” he wrote.

Later, Musk said Forest Service employees and oth­ers will likely be sent an­other email if they don’t re­spond to the one from over the weekend.

“Subject to the discretion of the President, they will be given another chance. Failure to respond a sec­ond time will result in ter­mination,” he wrote on X. (https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1894177129887404484)

If federal employees do respond to the emails, their statements are expected to be fed into an artificial in­telligence system to deter­mine whether those jobs are necessary, according to re­ports from the nation’s cap­ital. The AI system will de­termine whether someone’s work is “mission-critical” or not.

The OPM email did not mention the word “resig­nation,” but reads: “Please reply to this email with ap­prox. 5 bullets of what you accomplished last week and cc your manager. Please do not send any classified information, links, or at­tachments. Deadline is this Monday at 11:59pm EST.”

One Forest Service em­ployee Paddle and Portage spoke with said the email looked like “spam” or junk mail.

Meanwhile, the USDA sent Paddle and Portage a response last week when we inquired how many em­ployees have been terminat­ed from Superior National Forest as part of ongoing efforts to shrink the size of the federal government. The response to questions about how many employees were terminated reads as follows:

“Secretary (Brooke) Rol­lins fully supports the Pres­ident’s directive to improve government, eliminate in­efficiencies, and strengthen USDA’s many services to the American people. We have a solemn responsibil­ity to be good stewards of the American people’s hard-earned taxpayer dollars and to ensure that every dollar spent goes to serve the peo­ple, not the bureaucracy.

As part of this effort, USDA has made the dif­ficult decision to release about 2,000 probationary, non-firefighting employees from the Forest Service. To be clear, none of these in­dividuals were operational firefighters. Released em­ployees were probationary in status, many of whom were compensated by tem­porary IRA funding. It’s unfortunate that the Biden administration hired thou­sands of people with no plan in place to pay them long term. Secretary Rollins is committed to preserving essential safety positions and will ensure that critical services remain uninter­rupted.”

Also Monday, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, which oversees various as­pects of the federal govern­ment, says there’s evidence DOGE and the Trump ad­ministration violated federal law in firing probationary employees, including some on Superior National Forest.

In a statement, an agent from the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, said there are legal principles that guide how federal agen­cies hire and fire employ­ees. The agent notes that all employees, including those still in their probationary period, should be evaluat­ed based on individual per­formance. Some workers who were fired earlier this month claim they were fired unjustly and not based on their work performance, ac­cording to emails that were shared with Paddle and Por­tage.

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular