fbpx
Monday, September 16, 2024
HomeBusinessInflation and the Coming Election. Who Has a Better Plan?

Inflation and the Coming Election. Who Has a Better Plan?

Folks may be surprised to learn that to some degree, there are economic bene­fits to inflation. In an article written by Sean Ross and published in June of this year by Investopedia, the author states that, “When the economy is not running at capacity, meaning there is unused labor or resourc­es, inflation theoretically helps increase production. More dollars translates to more spending, which equates to more aggregated demand. More demand, in turn, triggers more produc­tion to meet that demand”. The author goes on to say, “For many, inflation is scary and detrimental. For others, inflation is a necessary part of growing the economy. An important consideration of inflation is the govern­ment’s response which often raises interest rates, slows the economy, and increases the risk of inflation. During inflationary periods, some parties benefit while others face greater risks.”

Voters tend to blame infla­tion solely on the economic policies of the sitting ad­ministration and while it’s easy to point fingers and administrative policies do play a role, the drivers of inflation are more compli­cated than simply blaming the current office holder. The inflation rate remains high, in part due to residu­al pandemic era economic dislocation. Other common inflationary drivers include increased production and labor costs related to supply chain issues and discrep­ancies between supply and demand for goods. Busi­ness tax increases usually increase prices which, in turn, get passed to consum­ers while tax cuts, which boost consumer spending, can cause demand for goods to outstrip supply, thus, in­creasing the price of goods.. We can also add the climate crisis as a driver. Then, there’s always the practice of market manipulation in the form of price fixing.

Corporate price fixing is when companies that pro­duce products and services agree, either in writing or verbally, to raise, lower, or maintain prices or price levels. In the conservative Hillsdale College newslet­ter, Imprimis, author Hen­ry Hazlitt recently wrote, “Price fixing destroys the signals on which this ev­er-changing (economic) balance depends. It always does harm. And it is never a cure for inflation. Not only is price fixing never a cure for inflation, but in the long run it prolongs and increas­es inflation.”

The Federal Reserve also plays a role in managing inflation. The FED is part of the Executive Branch of government but works inde­pendently of the President. The FED’s job is to find the delicate balance between many economic factors in the hope of encouraging stability and predictabili­ty in the economy. Some­times the FED gets it right and sometimes they get it wrong. Federal Reserve Chair, Jerome Powell, a Trump appointee, has been slow to decrease interest rates in an attempt to slow inflation while avoiding re­cession. Threading this fine line helps to keep the labor market stable. All of this careful activity to maintain a stable economy shows that the free market by it­self, does not make for a healthy economy. No econ­omy would work if market demand, by itself, were the deciding factor. Currently, inflation is a global problem and, though we are not out of the woods, we are further along the road to recovery than any other wealthy na­tion.

Former President Trump has been making sweeping statements during the cur­rent campaign, saying that he will “end the inflation nightmare” and will bring prices down “very quickly”. Beyond those assertions, he has offered no substance on how he will accomplish these things. In fact, in an article published in Money Watch last month, writer Aimee Picchi points out that the key policies that make up Trump’s current eco­nomic plan focus on tariffs, tax cuts and a crackdown on immigration. Picchi writes that Trump’s approach is “likely to cause a flare-up in inflation, according to many Wall Street economists. That would be a painful outcome for consumers and businesses sapped by more than two years of surging prices. More broadly, re­newed inflationary pres­sures would also come as inflation is finally inching closer to the FED’s goal of 2% per year”. Trump’s as­sertion that he would bring prices down “very quickly” would necessitate the im­position of price controls, something that no one in the business world would accept. Picchi goes on to point out that “Trump’s eco­nomic policies could cause current recovery progress to stall, and even reverse.” Re­garding corporate tax cuts and cracking down on im­migrants, Picchi writes,“the sharp corporate tax cuts Trump has floated would act as an inflationary fiscal stimulus. And another cen­tral plank — deporting im­migrants — could force em­ployers to pay higher wages to attract a shrinking pool of workers, also adding to pricing pressures.”

An NBC News article from January, 2021, states, “Trump Inherited A Boom­ing Economy And Handed Biden A Nation In Sham­bles”. To be fair, some of the “shambles” were due to the economic damage done by the pandemic, including the fact that the country had lost 10 million jobs under Trump and the economy was on the verge of shut­down. The Biden – Harris administration addressed the crisis by enacting poli­cies designed to move the economy forward by in­vesting in infrastructure projects, technology, energy and jobs. These initiatives have helped move things toward a healthy economic recovery and this is why the Biden – Harris administra­tion have been credited for much of the recovery that is happening. Vice Presi­dent Harris has said that if elected, she will support policies that help to create jobs and invest in working and middle class Ameri­cans including, extending the child tax credit. She has said that she will invest in small businesses and will work to make sure corpo­rations and the super rich pay their fair share of taxes. She will also work to limit competition killing corpo­rate mergers by enforcing antitrust laws. Harris also has her eye on taking steps to stop corporations from stockpiling wealth through stock buybacks. An article published in the Michigan Journal of Economics out­lines the impacts of stock buybacks. “Overall, the ability to use one’s own profits to buy back one’s own stock is harmful to the average American. It diverts money away from investing in workers or physical cap­ital and disproportionately aids the wealthy. It allows for artificial inflation of a stock’s price, and it allows, in theory, a variety of ways in which companies can use stock buybacks to manip­ulate stock prices to their benefit.”

Food prices are still high. This is related, in part, to price fixing. Competition among the corporate food industry has been reduced through corporate merg­ers. This is reflected in an article published in TIME magazine in 2022. Author Claire Kalloway wrote, “Food production has con­solidated dramatically since the 1970’s after changes in antitrust policy allowed more companies to buy up their competitors. De­pending on who you ask, antitrust practitioners say markets are “oligopolistic” or dangerously concentrat­ed when the top four firms control 40% to 50% of the market, or more. Higher levels of concentration give businesses more power to set prices and increase the likelihood of price-fixing or market manipulation. To­day, the top four food cor­porations control more than 60% of the U.S. market for pork, coffee, cookies, beer and bread. In beef process­ing, baby food, pasta and soda, the top four compa­nies control more than 80% of the U.S. market.”

These kinds of monopo­lies tend to encourage price fixing and price gouging and the folks who bear the brunt of that are regular folks like you and me. The econom­ic playing field has been slanted toward the wealthy since the Regan administra­tion and has led to signifi­cant economic inequalities. Reaganomics consisted of “hands off” policies that al­lowed corporations to create monopolies and engage in practices like price fixing. This is, in part, why we are paying more at the grocery store and at the gas pump..

There are no quick fixes for solving the inflation puzzle and this election is about more than the tradi­tional policy approaches that either party has taken over the past decades. One candidate has a track record of policies that have been long on promise and short on delivery. The other can­didate has been part of an administration that has es­tablished a track record of success in helping strength­en the economy, lower in­flation and bring us back from the devastations of the pandemic. Obviously, there is more work that needs to be done.

Both Parties have pub­lished their policy plat­forms, including their plans for how they will deal with the economy and inflation. You can find the platforms online for free at the Ameri­can Presidency Project. For your own edification, read both of them! The future is ours to decide. We need to know who and what we are voting for in November.

Sources for this article in­clude:

Imprimis. The Dangers of Price controls.
NBC News. Trump inherit­ed a booming economy — and handed Biden
AP: Harris will carry Biden’s economic record into the election.
CBS News: Trump says he’ll end the “inflation nightmare.”
Federation For Economic Education. The Economics of Price Fixing – FEE.org
Fortune. Corporate tax tac­tics supercharging inequali­ty in U.S.
University of Michigan. How Stock Buybacks Im­pact the Economy Op: Ed
Investopedia. When Is In­flation Good for the Econ­omy?
TIME Magazine. U.S. Food Prices Are Up.

Rick Evans
Rick Evans
My wife, Marsha Kinzer (a proud DEHS Greyhound, class of ‘77) introduced me to the North Shore on vacation in 2012. It became our regular escape when the stress of our careers in education became overwhelming, and it didn’t take me long to fall in love with the breathtaking scenery, the nice people, and “salad” containing Jell-o and marshmallows. So you can either blame or thank my loving wife for my being here, because when we needed to choose a retirement hometown, Marsha advocated hard for her beloved Duluth, and here we are, six months later. Yes, this will be my first northern Minnesota winter. Yes, I welcome thoughts and prayers. Government, public policy, and social justice weighed heavily in the curriculums I taught at the high school level over a thirty-eight year career. In addition, we were a laboratory school focused on critical thinking in conjunction with technical and scientific writing. So when I found myself adrift on the great ocean of retirement and spied a raft, I jumped at the chance to take up what I’d left behind…minus the bad teachers’ lounge coffee. My position at the NSJ allows me to combine my passions for government and writing, and it’s helping me to feel less out of touch in new surroundings. When I’m not being “Cubby” (Marsha’s favorite new nickname for this green reporter) I enjoy pointing at eagles and saying, “Look, honey. There’s an eagle.” I’ve had an active side hustle as a professional musician for almost as many years as Charlie Parr. As a guitarist/singer/songwriter, I graced the stages of clubs and festivals around southern Wisconsin, including an appearance on A Prairie Home Companion. Should I even mention A Prairie Home Companion, or am I the only one here old enough to remember what that is? Look! An eagle!
RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular